Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Three Loco (EP)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Three Loco. EP isn't notable (non-admin closure) ⋘HueSatLum ? ❢⋙ 15:29, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Three Loco (EP) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NALBUM in all regards -MJH (talk) 01:53, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — sparklism hey! 12:31, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:10, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into the band's page. The EP itself isn't notable. 1292simon (talk) 02:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Three Loco, the page for the band. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:48, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per the above. As the band's only release, and with so little to write about it, a merge is the obvious course. --Michig (talk) 07:27, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.